Monday, September 22, 2008

Are Unions Still Relevant?

I’ve been a member of two “talent” unions since I was 14 – and working part time as a DJ in Boston, my home town. In those days Boston was run by a powerful Democratic political machine – and it was definitely a union town. Virtually every radio and TV station – and anything shot on film - was union. So even a kid like me had to ante up the initiation fees and dues. I came from a show biz family and was used to it. My father - a pianist – was a member of the musicians’s union during its “don’t mess with us or we’ll bust your head” period under the now legendary national leadership of James Petrillo. My mother – a singer – was a member of AGVA – which covered night club entertainers. And in college - all of us aspiring actors were desperate to get into an Equity summer stock show - because you had to be in Equity to go to an Equity casting call – but you couldn’t get into Equity unless you were hired for a union show. A Catch 22 before any of us had ever heard of it.

Early on I gave up my dreams of life upon the wicked stage for the more prosaic – and attainable dream of network news. As it turned out – I had just enough acting ability to read and talk the news before the mic and the camera. I also had a questioning mind that was a lot more useful to a reporter than to a bit part actor who was only pretending she could also sing and dance.

For a long time, I worked only under AFTRA (www.aftra.org) union contracts. I was covered for medical benefits – and my employers were required to pay into my union-centered pension – whether I worked as a staff employee or was free lance. It was a good – and in a chaotic industry – a relatively orderly life.

Then – along came cable.

And AFTRA chose not to bother with cable -- figuring the money in these then niche networks was so insignificant it wasn't worth the organizing time. I know; I was on the local union board during that incubation period. Instead of dealing with real issues, our board members seemed mostly interested in making long speeches. Which is why I quit; it was a total waste of time.

So --- many years later -- here we are – in an age where unions in general are increasingly powerless and the companies they negotiate with are increasingly all-powerful and demanding. So what are the talent unions doing? AFTRA (the “live” and tape/recorded union) is fighting with SAG (the film union) –although at this point the craft designations have almost no meaning as digital and internet technology roll over all of us faster than we can pick ourselves up. (Granted the foolish fights seem to be mostly picked by SAG www.sag.org).

There are huge cable networks like the one I work for - CNBC - and of course CNN --the most obvious example - which are non-union. That means nothing is paid into the AFTRA pension and health funds.

For freelancers like me this is a terrible loss. Having medical and pension benefits centered in a union so wherever you work you still get benefits was a master stroke by all the talent unions as they began to gain leverage decades ago. But if eventually there are no organized media companies left to pay into them -- what's the point?

All of this was just brought home to me very powerfully; I did a one line voice-over as a newsperson for an HBO program more than a year ago. And HBO continues to operate under a pre-existing AFTRA contract. Not only did I get paid what to me is a very large sum for just 5 minutes of work --- I have so far gotten 2 residual checks from AFTRA for only slightly less than I was paid for the initial session.

Now I am a business reporter -- which might make me argue that this type of payment scale may be unsustainable in our new, digitally splintered media world. Except that most of those "splintered" media entities -- internet, cable, digital cable, mobile etc. -- are still owned by the top 10 media companies. Companies which in turn may be owned by even bigger international corporations.

Bottom line to all this: none of us really knows where our industry is going as technology continues to drive change. But as a newsperson it is pretty clear to me that we - certainly - will soon have no separate designations. Print journalists are doing video for newspaper websites; broadcast journalists are writing for websites and taking still photos and of course also increasingly shooting and editing video. We have too many separate unions for this scenario -- where there ARE unions left. It seems to me we have to join forces and our first job should be to unionize as many types of media operations as possible -- even if only for small money. We have to be ready for whatever technology -- and these huge corporations - throw at us.

And second -- we have to be sure our members get something useful out of belonging to a union. Of course salaries matter. But at CNBC, for instance, people get paid pretty much what they would at union operations. And working conditions are reasonable. It's how they’ve kept the unions (no technical unions either) out. So money isn't really the issue. It's benefits. It's some kind of job security. It's provision for medical leave or the like. Etc. But most of all, I think, it's offering ways for members to upgrade their skills at all levels and in all jurisdictions so we can compete with the 22 year old college graduate -- who HAS learned it all and is so comfortable with technology that he or she sees no rough edges. These folks just do whatever is needed and that is what all of us have to learn to do also. Years ago the technical unions used to have something we knew as "one machine, one operator". You ran a tape machine or turned a dial in master control. There were penalties for asking you to do more. Late lunch penalties. "Golden time" penalties.

Non-media companies came in during the 80's and early 90's and smashed that model to smithereens. Now the same thing is happening in the written and spoken media. Actors may be insulated right now -- but they may not be in the future. We are ALL going to HAVE to do more for less money. At least for now. Until our separate and entrenched leaderships realize that only one, huge and united craft union can wield enough power and leverage to fight back for all of us.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Stephani –

This is a very good essay, and you raise several valid points. You make a great case for the value of unions, especially in a multi-employer environment such as the media industry. And sadly, you remind us of what’s been lost over the years.

However, I do want to take you to task for being so dismissive of your experience on your AFTRA Board. Of course a lot of hot air gets blown around at union meetings, especially from actors and journalists -- people who basically make their living shooting their mouths off. But that’s DEMOCRACY, and it’s most assuredly not a “total waste of time.” Not if you really care about the issues you address, such as the loss of good wages (especially residuals) and portable (multi-employer) benefits. These losses come from an erosion of union density, and we should all worry what will happen when density falls so low that employers no longer feel the pressure to pay “pretty much what they would at union operations.”

Your final point is right on – we desperately need ONE “huge and united” union in our industry! And the way to get that big, powerful union is to get involved again. Get back on the AFTRA Board; raise that “strident” voice -- blow some hot air of your own! We need experienced, credible, articulate people like you to participate in union governance, to overcome the institutional inertia that is keeping us mired in the past. Otherwise, it’s all just kvetching on a blog, which may feel good, but doesn’t move us forward.

Mark Bradley, AEA, AFTRA, SAG

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Stephanie, for an insightful and provocative essay which I am sharing with a number of fellow union members. I do share Mark's Bradley's sentiments (including his gentle chiding), and as current President of the Boston AFTRA Local, I can assure you that you wouldn't find our meetings a "waste of time;" there's not a single bloviator among us. And we'd welcome someone with your knowledge,experience and drive. As a matter of fact, I think you'd find the same to be true of AFTRA's current National Board and staff. Come back, Stephanie, we need more folks like you in the trenches with us!

Paul Horn, Boston Local President and AFTRA National Board member (SAG member too!)

Anonymous said...

Stephanie:

Thanks for eloquently raising the issue of union relevance in an increasingly fragmented media world. It is a challenge to the calcified workings of an under-funded union to remain not only relevant, but thought-leading in the area of performer's and broadcaster's rights in the workplace, and how best to attain those rights. The "New Media" conundrum is that it is at once completely democratic and totally fragmented, which presents a difficult target that is not only moving, but also changing shape as fast as you can draw a bead on it.
As a union, we are often composed of a militaristic few urging on an army of complacency. Hopefully, once the army realizes they are the cannon fodder of the mega-media and mega-non-media corporations who want to exploit their talent as efficiently as possible, they will wake up to the fact that they need to protect their intellectual property in an era that values it.

Thanks for your input. I parrot Mr. Horn's admonition to get involved; we need intelligent people with keen insight and strong opinions.

Sincerely,

Michael Kraft
Cleveland AFTRA Local President

Anonymous said...

Stephanie--

Echoing all the rest, thank you for your thoughts. I am president of NY AFTRA, and am an actor, and can sadly tell you that we are not insulated from this new media and employer/media fragmentation at all: it is one of the core issues in the recent strong contract we got for our Exhibit A (PrimeTime TV) contract--overseeing the New Media work that will eventually be as commonplace as current 'traditional media,' in your field and mine.

What that means in terms of your piece is simply that you are right: we need to merge numerous multi-platform unions into--if not an over sized giant union with no focus, then at least a unified team of unions who speak to each other, and defend our rights and jobs with a unified voice.

AFTRA has been working for this for a while now--yet I accept your recollection of hot-air meetings; they are a curse of an era we are trying to kill off as quickly as Sarah Palin's trying to kill off Polar Bears. So give us another shot, and hopefully we will make you glad you did. And also know that many in SAG (myself included as a vested 23 year member) agree completely with you, and our leadership is being shown the power of your thinking in this very election cycle.

Thank you for your energy, thoughts, and dedication to others in your field.

-Holter Graham
President, AFTRA NY
AEA, SAG

Anonymous said...

It's very encouraging to get so many well thought-out comments. Maybe there is hope, yet, for our union. I am also a SAG member and have been horrified at SAG ladership's actions since merger with AFTRA was rejected. As a reporter,I have watched twice while big corporations crushed a technical union at two local TV stations in New York. We HAVE to be strong enough in numbers, jurisdictions, talent and skills to fight back. What is happening right now at WNBC-TV Channel 4 may be a wake-up call for anyone who still believes the old ways of bargaining will work. We haven't any time left for "blovating". Not in Congress as our financial system goes down the tubes -- and not in our industry.

Stephani Shelton

Unknown said...

Stephani --

I echo the comments of Mark, Paul, Mike,and Holter, who happen to be some of the most dynamic leaders within AFTRA at the moment. Your assessment of the state of the unions is pretty accurate. I remember all the hot air at national AFTRA national board meetings just a few years ago, and didn't know if I could handle it. But I realized, as Mark said, you have to expect some "air" from folks who make their living in front of a mic. And things have changed. The rhetoric has quieted down at meetings. As a union, AFTRA is in a much trimmer "fighting" mode, determined to stay relevant in the digital age.

I would disagree slightly with your point about AFTRA ignoring cable when it came out. AFTRA actually jumped on the bandwagon way ahead of its sister union and began quietly organizing shows one by one, offering realistic contracts depending on the size of the market and the show's budget. This is one of the things the current SAG leadership tried to attack. They wanted AFTRA to impose SAG's one-size-fits-all contract on all shows, regardless of budget or market size.

I worked in the Boston market for many years before heading back west, and I watched the region change in the way you describe. I do think the union continues to offer many positive things to a union performer there, despite the rapid changes. It has become imperative for the unions to stop squabbling and begin working with a single voice.

Thanks for your insights.

Jim Huston
Houston AFTRA and SAG National Board member

Bob Souer said...

Stephanie,

Thank you for this thoughtful and thought-provoking post. I'm grateful to know that such thinking it taking place, because honestly I'd pretty much given up hope that things might ever get sensible again.

Be well,
Bob Souer
Voice actor
Charlotte, NC

Anonymous said...

Steph:

On the frozen tundra to your north, we wrestle with the selfsame issues.
Your articulate blog cuts right to the marrow.
Were I to depend on my beloved union work, my family would starve quite quickly.

Catch up, unions!
The industry has left you and your members behind.

-Robert Jadah